Deets On Fraudulent Colonizer Deals Leading Up To The Revolutionary War
Deets On The Native American Struggle
Deets On Fraudulent Colonizer Deals Leading Up To The Revolutionary War
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F65432765-46c6-4103-9ddb-1cbf588ff2a8_600x399.jpeg)
Deets On Fraudulent Colonizer Deals Leading Up To The Revolutionary War
The history of European colonization in North America is marked by a series of agreements, treaties, and transactions between colonizers and indigenous peoples. However, many of these dealings were marred by fraud, deception, and exploitation, as European settlers sought to expand their territorial claims at the expense of native communities. In this chapter, we will explore some of the fraudulent colonizer deals with Native/Indigenous Americans leading up to the Revolutionary War, examining the context of these events, the tactics employed by colonizers, and the enduring impacts on indigenous peoples.
Pre-Colonial Context: Indigenous Sovereignty and Land Tenure
Before the arrival of European settlers, North America was home to diverse indigenous nations with complex social, political, and cultural systems. These indigenous societies had established their own forms of governance, land tenure, and trade networks, which varied widely across different regions.
Indigenous peoples viewed land as a communal resource, belonging to the community as a whole rather than to individuals. Land was not bought or sold but instead used for hunting, gathering, agriculture, and spiritual practices. Indigenous nations maintained their sovereignty and autonomy through treaties and alliances with neighboring tribes, often mediated through ceremonial gatherings and councils.
However, European colonization brought about significant changes to the indigenous landscape, as settlers sought to assert their control over land and resources. The concept of private property, foreign to many indigenous cultures, clashed with indigenous notions of communal land ownership, leading to conflicts and tensions over territory.
Early Colonizer Deals: The Doctrine of Discovery and the Treaty of Easton (1758)
The Doctrine of Discovery, a legal principle originating from European colonialism, played a central role in justifying the dispossession of indigenous lands. Under this doctrine, European powers claimed the right to "discover" and take possession of lands inhabited by indigenous peoples, regardless of existing indigenous sovereignty or land tenure systems.
One of the earliest examples of colonizer deals with Native Americans occurred with the signing of the Treaty of Easton in 1758. The treaty, negotiated between British colonial authorities and several indigenous nations, including the Delaware, Shawnee, and Iroquois, sought to secure indigenous support for the British during the French and Indian War.
However, the Treaty of Easton was marked by fraud and deception on the part of the British, who promised land and protection to indigenous allies in exchange for their allegiance. Yet, these promises were often hollow, as the British had no intention of honoring their commitments once the war was over. Instead, they continued to encroach upon indigenous territories, leading to further conflicts and hostilities.
Land Cessions and Treaties: The Proclamation Line of 1763 and the Treaty of Fort Stanwix (1768)
Following the French and Indian War, which ended in 1763, the British government sought to consolidate its control over newly acquired territories in North America. In an attempt to prevent further conflict with indigenous peoples and to stabilize relations on the frontier, the British issued the Proclamation of 1763.
The Proclamation of 1763 established a boundary between colonial settlements and indigenous territories, prohibiting British colonists from settling west of the Appalachian Mountains without permission from the Crown. While intended to protect indigenous lands, the Proclamation of 1763 was met with resistance from colonists who viewed it as an impediment to their expansion.
In the years that followed, the British government pursued a policy of negotiating treaties with indigenous nations to acquire land for colonial settlement. One such treaty was the Treaty of Fort Stanwix, signed in 1768 between British representatives and the Iroquois Confederacy. Under the terms of the treaty, the Iroquois ceded large tracts of land in present-day New York and Pennsylvania to the British Crown in exchange for goods and other concessions.
However, the Treaty of Fort Stanwix was deeply flawed, as it was negotiated without the consent or participation of many affected indigenous nations. Moreover, the terms of the treaty were often misrepresented or manipulated by colonial officials, who used threats, coercion, and bribery to secure indigenous consent.
Fraud and Deception: The Walking Purchase (1737) and the Treaty of Fort Stanwix (1768)
Two notable examples of fraudulent colonizer deals with Native Americans are the Walking Purchase of 1737 and the Treaty of Fort Stanwix of 1768.
The Walking Purchase of 1737 was a land deal between the Pennsylvania colonial government and the Delaware (Lenape) Indians. The Penn family, proprietors of the colony, claimed that a decades-old treaty with the Delaware granted them the right to purchase as much land as a man could walk in a day and a half. However, the Penn family engaged in deceit by clearing a path in advance and hiring swift runners to cover as much distance as possible. As a result, the Delaware were forced to cede over a million acres of land, far beyond what they had agreed to.
Similarly, the Treaty of Fort Stanwix of 1768 was negotiated under duress and misrepresentation. British officials, seeking to acquire indigenous lands for colonial settlement, pressured representatives of the Iroquois Confederacy to sign the treaty, threatening military force if they refused. Moreover, the terms of the treaty were skewed in favor of the British, who offered inadequate compensation for the vast tracts of land ceded by the Iroquois.
These examples illustrate the pervasive use of fraud, deception, and coercion by European colonizers in their dealings with indigenous peoples. By exploiting power differentials and manipulating negotiations, colonizers sought to expand their territorial claims at the expense of indigenous sovereignty and rights.
Resistance and Consequences: Indigenous Responses to Colonizer Deals
Despite the fraud and deception perpetrated by European colonizers, indigenous peoples did not passively acquiesce to their demands. Instead, they resisted colonization through various means, including armed resistance, diplomatic negotiations, and cultural revitalization.
In response to fraudulent land deals and encroachments on their territories, indigenous nations often engaged in armed resistance to defend their lands and sovereignty. The Pontiac's War of 1763, for example, was a coordinated uprising by several indigenous nations against British colonial expansion in the Great Lakes region. Led by the Ottawa chief Pontiac, indigenous warriors launched attacks on British forts and settlements, seeking to drive out the colonizers and reclaim their ancestral lands.
Diplomatic negotiations were another important strategy employed by indigenous leaders to resist colonization and protect their interests. Indigenous diplomats, such as the Cherokee chief Attakullakulla and the Iroquois sachem Canasatego, negotiated treaties and alliances with colonial powers in an attempt to secure favorable terms for their nations. However, these efforts were often undermined by colonial deception and betrayal, as illustrated by the Treaty of Fort Stanwix and other fraudulent agreements.
Cultural revitalization and resistance movements also played a crucial role in indigenous resistance to colonization. Indigenous leaders, such as the Shawnee prophet Tenskwatawa and the Neolin, preached messages of cultural renewal and resistance to colonial influence. These spiritual movements inspired indigenous peoples to reclaim their traditional ways of life and reject the assimilationist policies of European colonizers.
The Legacy of Fraudulent Colonizer Deals: Impacts on Indigenous Peoples
The legacy of fraudulent colonizer deals with Native Americans has had far-reaching consequences for indigenous peoples, shaping their experiences of colonization and dispossession.
One of the most significant impacts of fraudulent colonizer deals is the loss of indigenous lands and resources. Through deceit, coercion, and manipulation, European colonizers acquired vast tracts of indigenous territory, displacing indigenous communities and disrupting their traditional ways of life. The loss of land had profound social, economic, and cultural consequences for indigenous peoples, leading to poverty, marginalization, and cultural dislocation.
Moreover, fraudulent colonizer deals eroded indigenous sovereignty and self-determination, undermining indigenous governance structures and legal systems. By imposing colonial treaties and laws on indigenous nations without their consent, European colonizers sought to assert their authority and control over indigenous lands and resources. This legacy of colonialism continues to impact indigenous communities today, as they struggle to reclaim their rights and sovereignty in the face of ongoing discrimination and marginalization.
Furthermore, fraudulent colonizer deals perpetuated a legacy of mistrust and resentment between indigenous peoples and colonial powers. The betrayal and deception experienced by indigenous nations at the hands of European colonizers left deep scars that continue to shape intergenerational trauma and distrust of government authorities.
Conclusion
In conclusion, fraudulent colonizer deals with Native/Indigenous Americans leading up to the Revolutionary War exemplify the injustices and abuses perpetrated by European colonizers in their quest for land and resources. Through fraud, deception, and coercion, colonizers exploited power differentials and violated indigenous sovereignty and rights, leading to the dispossession and displacement of indigenous communities.
Despite the fraud and deception perpetrated by European colonizers, indigenous peoples resisted colonization through various means, including armed resistance, diplomatic negotiations, and cultural revitalization. However, the legacy of fraudulent colonizer deals continues to impact indigenous communities today, shaping their experiences of colonization and dispossession.
As we reflect on this history, it is essential to acknowledge the ongoing struggles of indigenous peoples for justice, sovereignty, and recognition. By confronting the legacies of colonialism and supporting indigenous-led movements for self-determination, we can work towards a more just and equitable future for all.